Explanatory Notes        Apparatus Notes ()

Source: United States Library of Congress, Washington, D.C ([DLC])

Cue: "To-day my new"

Source format: "MS"

Letter type: "[standard letter]"

Notes:

Last modified:

Revision History: AB

Published on MTPO: 2007

Print Publication: v3

MTPDocEd
To Whitelaw Reid
15 August 1869 • Buffalo, N.Y. (MS: DLC, UCCL 00334)
Whitelaw Reed Esq
Dear Sir:

To-day my new book will be sent to the Tribune—& this is to ask you if you won’t get your reviewer to praise the bad passages & feeble places in it for me. They emendation are the only ones I am worrying about, you know—the meritorious parts can get along themselves, of course.

I date this at Hartford, so that there shall not appear to be any collusion between my publisher & me, or that he has suggested this note,—but in reality I am rea in reality in the “Express” office at Buffalo, & have not been near Hartford lately.1explanatory note

Heartily Yrs
Sam. L. Clemens.

Textual Commentary
15 August 1869 • To Whitelaw ReidBuffalo, N.Y.UCCL 00334
Source text(s):

MS, Papers of the Reid Family, Library of Congress, Washington, D.C. (DLC).

Previous Publication:

L3 , 303.

Provenance:

donated to DLC between 1953 and 1973 by Mrs. Helen Rogers Reid and her sons, Whitelaw Reid and Ogden R. Reid.

More information on provenance may be found in Description of Provenanceclick to open link.

Explanatory Notes
1 

This letter may have accompanied a review copy. The New York Tribune’s long and complimentary notice appeared on 27 August 1869. For Clemens’s reaction to it, see his letter of 7 September to Reid.

Emendations and Textual Notes
  They ●  Th◇◇ torn
Top