Explanatory Notes        Apparatus Notes ()

Source: Vassar College, Poughkeepsie, N.Y ([NPV])

Cue: "The fact looks"

Source format: "MS"

Letter type: "[standard letter]"

Notes:

Last modified:

Revision History: Larson, Brian

Published on MTPO: 2024

Print Publication:

MTPDocEd
To Charles L. Webster
27 March 1884 • Hartford, Conn. (MS, in pencil: NPV, UCCL 02939)
Dear Charley—

The fact looks correct—that is, that this was a legitimate item of the “manufacture”—but the price! Inquire, & see what this work was that was worth so much . How many hours—& how much an hour.

When we added $10,000 “addition” to this house, the architect drew all the plans, & gave personal attention to the building, for $500, & would have drawn the building contracts without additional charge.

Alexander & Green charged me but $800 for that whole, long, complex Slote case.

To approve & “place” 300 pictures, & contract for the drawing & processing of them is not a long or heavy job, I take it. If Anthony was hired to run through the MS & suggest things for illustration that seems kind of unnecessary, for the artist could have done that himself.

But find out what length of time Anthony put on this work, & what the system of charging is,—then we can come to a right judgment in this matter.

Ys
S L C

S. L. C. It isn’t worth while for Osgood to write me is on isolated details—he can lay all his objections before me at one & the same time, through you when you come back here.

letter docketed by Webster: 2.38 per hour— | 25 days full.

Textual Commentary
Source text(s):

MS, in pencil, Jean Webster McKinney Family Papers, Special Collections, NPV.

Previous Publication:

MTBus, 245–46.

Provenance:

see McKinney Family Papers in Description of Provenanceclick to open link.

Top