January 16th, continued. Ⓐapparatus note About General Sickles. Ⓐapparatus note
With considerable frequency, since then, I have tried to get publishers to make the experiment of such a magazine, but I was never successful. I was never able to convince a publisherⒶapparatus note that The Back NumberⒶapparatus note would interest the public. Not one of them was able to conceive of the idea of a sane human being finding interest in stale things. I made my latest effort three years agoⒺexplanatory note. Again I failed to convince. But I, myself, am not convinced. I am quite sure that The Back NumberⒶapparatus note would succeed and become a favorite. I am also sure of another thing—that The Back NumberⒶapparatus note would have this advantage over any other magazine that was ever issued, to wit: that the man who read the first paragraph in it would go on and read the magazine entirely through, skipping nothing—whereas there is no magazine in existence which ever contains three articles which can be depended upon to interest the reader. It is necessary to put a dozenⒶapparatus note articles into a magazine of the day in order to hit six or eight tastes. One man buys the magazine for one of its articles, another is attracted by another,Ⓐapparatus note another by a third; but no man buys the magazine because of the whole of its contents. I contend that The Back NumberⒶapparatus note would be bought for the whole of its contents, and that each reader would read the whole.Ⓐapparatus note
“Mr. Paine, you and I will start that magazine, and try the experiment, if you are willing to select the ancient news from old books and newspapers, and do the rest of the editorial work. Are you willing?”
Mr. Paine. “I should be very willing, when we get so that we can undertake it.”
“Very well, then we will, by and by, make that experiment.”
TwichellⒶapparatus note and I stepped across the street, that night, in the rain, and spent an hour with General Sickles. Sickles is eighty-one years old, now. I had met him only once or twice before, although there has been only the width of 9th streetⒶapparatus note between us for a year. He is too old to make visits, and I am too lazy. I remember when he killed PhilipⒶapparatus note Barton Key, son of the author of “The Star-Spangled Banner,” and I remember the prodigious excitement it made in the country. I think it cannot be far from fifty years ago. My vague recollection of it is that it happened in Washington, and that I was there at the timeⒺexplanatory note.
I have felt well acquainted with GeneralⒶapparatus note Sickles for thirty-eight or thirty-nine years, because I have known TwichellⒶapparatus note that long. TwichellⒶapparatus note was a chaplain in Sickles’s brigade in the Civil WarⒺexplanatory note, and he was always fond of talking about the General. TwichellⒶapparatus note was under Sickles all through the war. Whenever he comes down from Hartford he makes it his duty to go and pay his respects [begin page 288] to the General. Sickles is a genial old fellowⒶapparatus note; a handsome and statelyⒶapparatus note military figure; talks smoothly,Ⓐapparatus note in well-constructed English—I may say perfectly constructed English. His talk is full of interest and bristling with points, but as there are no emphases scattered through it anywhere, and as there is no animation in it, it soon becomes oppressive by its monotony, and it makes the listener drowsy. TwichellⒶapparatus note had to step on my foot once or twice. The late Bill Nye once said “I have been toldⒶapparatus note that Wagner’s music is better than it soundsⒺexplanatory note.” That felicitous description of a something which so many people have tried to describe, and couldn’t, does seem to fit the General’s manner of speech exactly. His talk is much better than it is. No, that is not the idea—there seems to be a lack there somewhere. Maybe it is another case of the sort just quoted. Maybe Nye would say that “itⒶapparatus note is better than it sounds.” I think that is it. His talk does not sound entertaining, but it is distinctly entertaining.
Sickles lost a leg at Gettysburg, and I remember Twichell’sⒶapparatus note account of that circumstance. He talked about it on one of our long walks, a great many years ago, and although the details have passed out of my memory, I still carry the picture in my mind as presented by TwichellⒶapparatus note. The leg was carried off by a cannon ballⒶapparatus note. TwichellⒶapparatus note, and others, carried the General out of the battle, and they placed him on a bed made of boughs,Ⓐapparatus note under a tree. There was no surgeon present, and TwichellⒶapparatus note and Rev. Father O’HaganⒶapparatus note, a Catholic priest, made a make-shift tourniquet and stopped the gush of blood— checkedⒶapparatus note it, perhaps is the right term. A newspaper correspondent appeared first. GeneralⒶapparatus note Sickles considered himselfⒶapparatus note a dying man, and (if TwichellⒶapparatus note is as truthful a person as the character of his cloth requires him to be) General Sickles put aside everything connected with a future world in order to go out of this one in becoming style. And so he dictated his “last words”Ⓐapparatus note to that newspaper correspondent. That was Twichell’sⒶapparatus note idea—I remember it well—that the General, no doubt influenced by the fact that several people’s last words have been so badly chosen—whether by accident or intention—that they have outlived all the rest of the man’s fame, was moved to do his last words in a form calculated to petrify and preserve them for the future generations. TwichellⒶapparatus note quoted that speechⒺexplanatory note. I have forgotten what it was, now, but it was well chosen for its purpose.
Now when we sat there in the General’s presence listening to his monotonous talk—it was about himself, and is always about himself, and always seems modest and unexasperating, inoffensive,—it seemed to me that he was just the kind of man who would risk his salvation in order to do some “last words” in an attractive way. He murmured and warbled, and warbled, and it was all just as simple and pretty as it could be. And also I will say this: that he never made an ungenerous remark about anybody. He spoke severely of this and that and the other person—officers in the war—but he spoke with dignity and with courtesy. There was no malignity in what he said. He merely pronounced what he evidently regarded as just criticisms upon them.
IⒶapparatus note noticed then, what I had noticed once before, four or five months ago, that the General valued his lost leg away above the one that is left. I am perfectly sure that if he had to part with either of them he would part with the one that he has got. I have noticed this same thing in several other GeneralsⒶapparatus note who had lost a portion of themselves in the Civil War. There was General Fairchild, of Wisconsin. He lost an arm in one of the great battles. When he was Consul GeneralⒶapparatus note in Paris and we Clemenses were sojourning there some time or other, and grew to be well acquainted with him and with his familyⒺexplanatory note, I know that whenever a proper [begin page 289] occasion—an occasion which gave General Fairchild an opportunity to elevateⒶapparatus note the stump of the lost arm and wag it with effect—occurred,Ⓐapparatus note that is what he did. It was easy to forgive him for it, and I did it.
General Noyes was our Minister to France at the time. He had lost a leg in the warⒺexplanatory note. He was a pretty vain man, I will say that for him, and anybody could see—certainly I saw—that whenever there was a proper gathering around, NoyesⒶapparatus note presently seemed to disappear. There wasn’t anything left of him butⒶapparatus note the leg which he didn’t have.
Well, General Sickles sat there on the sofa and talked. It was a curious place. Two rooms of considerable size—parlors opening together with folding-doors—and the floors, the walls, the ceilings, cluttered up and overlaid with lion skins, tiger skins, leopard skins, elephantⒶapparatus note skins; photographs of the General at various times of life—photographs en civil; photographs in uniform; gushing sprays of swords fastened in trophy form against the wall; flags of various kinds stuck here and there and yonder; more animals; more skins; here and there and everywhere more and more skins; skins of wild creatures, always, I believe;—Ⓐapparatus notebeautiful skins. You couldn’t walk across that floor anywhere without stumbling over the hard heads of lions and things. You couldn’t put out a hand anywhere without laying it upon a velvety,Ⓐapparatus note exquisite tiger skinⒶapparatus note or leopard skin, and so on—oh,Ⓐapparatus note well, all the kinds of skins were there; it was as if a menagerie had undressed in the place. Then there was a most decided and rather unpleasant odor, which proceeded from disinfectants and preservatives and things such as you have to sprinkle on skins in order to discourage the moths—so it was not altogether a pleasant place, on that account. It was a kind of museum;Ⓐapparatus note and yet it was not the sort of museum which seemed dignified enough to be the museum of a great soldier—and so famous a soldier. It was the sort of museum which should delight and entertain little boys and girls. I suppose that that museum reveals a part of the General’s character and make. He is sweetly and winningly childlike.Ⓐapparatus note
Once, in Hartford,Ⓐapparatus note twenty or twenty-five years ago, just as TwichellⒶapparatus note was coming out of his gate Sunday morning to walk to his church and preach, a telegram was put into his hand. He read it immediately, and then, in a manner, collapsed. It saidⒶapparatus note “General Sickles died last night at midnight.”Ⓐapparatus note
Well, you can see, now, that itⒶapparatus note wasn’t so. But no matter—it was so to JoeⒶapparatus note at the time. He walked along—walked to the church—but his mind was far away. All his affection and homage and worship of his General had come to the fore. His heart was full of these emotions. He hardly knew where he was. In his pulpit, he stood up and began the service, but with a voice over which he had almost no command. TheⒶapparatus note congregation had never seen him thus moved, before,Ⓐapparatus note in his pulpit. They sat there and gazed at him and wondered what was the matter; because he was now reading,Ⓐapparatus note in this broken voice and with occasionalⒶapparatus note tears tricklingⒶapparatus note down his face,Ⓐapparatus note what to them seemed a quite unemotional chapter—that one about Moses begat Aaron, and Aaron begat Deuteronomy, and Deuteronomy begat St. Peter, and St. Peter begat Cain, and Cain begat AbelⒶapparatus note—and he was going along with this, and half crying—his voice continually breaking. TheⒶapparatus note congregation left theⒶapparatus note church that morning without being able to account for this most extraordinary thing—Ⓐapparatus noteas it seemed to them. That a man who had been a soldier for more than four years, and who had preached in that pulpit so many, many times on really [begin page 290] moving subjects, without even the quiver of a lip,Ⓐapparatus note should break all down over the BegatsⒶapparatus note, was a thing whichⒶapparatus note they couldn’t understand. But there it is—any one can see how such a mystery as that would arouse the curiosity of those people to the boiling-point.
TwichellⒶapparatus note has had many adventures. HeⒶapparatus note has more adventures in a year than anybody else has in five. One Saturday night he noticed a bottle on his wife’sⒶapparatus note dressing-bureau. He thought the label said “Hair Restorer,” and he took it in his room and gave his head a good drenching and sousing with it and carried it back and thought no more about it. Next morning when he got up his head was a bright green! He sent around everywhere and couldn’t get a substitute-preacherⒶapparatus note, so he had to go to hisⒶapparatus note church himselfⒶapparatus note and preach—and he did it. He hadn’t a sermon in his barrel—Ⓐapparatus noteas it happened—Ⓐapparatus noteof any lightsome character, so he had to preach a very grave one—a very serious one—and it made the matter worse. The gravity of the sermon did not harmonize with the gaietyⒶapparatus note of his head, and the people sat all through itⒶapparatus note with handkerchiefs stuffed in their mouthsⒶapparatus note to try to keep down their joy. And TwichellⒶapparatus note told me that he was sure he never had seen his congregation—theⒶapparatus note whole body of his congregation—the entire body of his congregation—absorbed in interest in his sermon, from beginning to end, before. Always there had been an aspect of indifference, here andⒶapparatus note there, or wandering,Ⓐapparatus note somewhere; but this time there was nothing of the kind.Ⓐapparatus note Those people sat there as if they thought, “Good for this day and train only:Ⓐapparatus note we must have all there is of this show, not wasteⒶapparatus note any of it.”Ⓐapparatus note And he said that when he came down out of the pulpit more people waited to shake him by the hand and tell him what a good sermon it was, than ever before. And it seemed a pity that these people should do these fictions in such a place—right in the church—when it was quite plain they were not interested in the sermon at all; they only wanted to get a near view of his head.
Well, TwichellⒶapparatus note said—no, TwichellⒶapparatus note didn’t say, I say, that as the days went on and Sunday followed Sunday, the interest in Twichell’sⒶapparatus note hair grew and grew; because it didn’t stay merely and monotonously green, itⒶapparatus note took on deeper and deeper shades of green; and then it would change and become reddish, and would go from that to some other color—purplish, yellowish, bluish, and so on—Ⓐapparatus notebut it was never a solid color. It was always mottled. And each Sunday it was a little more interesting than it was the Sunday before—and Twichell’sⒶapparatus note head became famous, and people came from New YorkⒶapparatus note and Boston, and South Carolina, and Japan,Ⓐapparatus note and so on, to look.Ⓐapparatus note There wasn’t seating capacity for all the people that cameⒶapparatus note while his head was undergoing these various and fascinating mottlings.Ⓐapparatus note And it was a good thing in several ways, because the business had been languishing a little, and now a lot of people joined the churchⒶapparatus note so that they could have the show, andⒶapparatus note it was the beginning of a prosperity for that church which has never diminished in all these years. Nothing so fortunate ever happened to JoeⒶapparatus note as that.Ⓐapparatus note
Well, he was telling—oh no, it was years ago, that he was telling about the sutler. In the Sickles brigade was a sutler, a Yankee, who was a wonderful person in the way of competency. All other sutlers got out of things on the eve of battle, during battle, after battle; not so with this sutler. He never got out of anything, and so he was very greatly respected and admired. [begin page 291] There were times when he would get drunk. These were periodical drunks. You couldn’t tell when he was going to have an experience of that kind, therefore you did not know how to provide for it. It was very necessary to provide for it, because when he was drunk he had no respect for anybody’s feelings or desires. If he wanted to do so and so he would do it; nothing could coax him to do some other way. If he didn’t want to do a thing nobody could persuade him to do it. On one of these occasions of sutlerian eclipse GeneralⒶapparatus note Sickles had invited some other GeneralsⒶapparatus note to dine with him in his headquarters-tent; his cook or his orderly, or somebody—the proper person—came to him aghast, and said “The sutler is drunk. We can’t have any dinner. There isn’t anything to cook and the sutler won’t sell us anything.”
“Did you tell him it was GeneralⒶapparatus note Sickles whoⒶapparatus note wanted these things?”
“Yes, sir. It didn’t make any difference with the sutler.”
“Well, can’t you get him to—”
“No, sir, we can’t get him to do anything. We have got some beans, and that is all we have got. We have tried to get him to sell us just a pound of pork for the General, and he says he won’t.”
GeneralⒶapparatus note Sickles said “Send for the chaplain. Let Chaplain Twichell go there. He is popular with that sutler; that sutler has great respect and reverence for Chaplain Twichell. Let him go there and see if he can’t prevail on the sutler to sell him a pound of salt pork for General Sickles.”
Twichell went on the errand—stated his errand.
The sutler propped himself unsteadily against some kind of a support, collected his thoughts, and the suitable words, and said,
“Sell you a pound of pork for General Sickles? Naw.Ⓐapparatus note Go back and tell him I wouldn’t sell youⒶapparatus note a pound of pork for God.”
That was Twichell’s story of the episode.
But I have wandered from that tree where General Sickles lay bleeding,Ⓐapparatus note and arranging his last words. It was three-quarters of an hour before a surgeon could be found, for that was a tremendous battle and surgeons were needed everywhere. When the surgeon arrived it was after nightfall. It was a still and windless July night, and there was a candle burning—I think somebody sat near the General’s head and held this candle in his hand. It threw just light enough to make the General’s face distinct, and there were several dimⒶapparatus note figures waiting around about.Ⓐapparatus note Into this group, out of the darkness, bursts an aide; springs lightly from his horse, approaches this white-faced expiring General, straightens himself upⒶapparatus note soldier-fashion, salutes, and reports in the most soldierly and matter-of-factⒶapparatus note way that he has carried out an order given him by the General, and that the movement of the regiments to the supporting point designated has been accomplished.
The General thanked him courteously. I am sure Sickles must have been always polite. It takes training to enable a person to be properly courteous when he is dying. Many have tried it. I suppose very few have succeeded.
I have tried to get publishers . . . latest effort three years ago] Clemens’s first attempt to make The Back Number a reality evidently came in November 1893, shortly after he prepared a prospectus for it (SLC 1893). He tried, unsuccessfully, to enlist the support of John Brisben Walker, editor of Cosmopolitan magazine. Clemens thought that Samuel E. Moffett, his nephew, could edit the magazine. Nothing is known of his 1903 effort to interest a publisher (Notebook 33, TS pp. 37, 38, 39a, CU-MARK).
Twichell and I stepped across the street . . . I was there at the time] Clemens and Twichell visited Daniel Edgar Sickles (1823–1914) at his home at 23 Fifth Avenue (Clemens lived at 21 Fifth Avenue on the corner of 9th Street) on the evening of 15 January 1906. Sickles was a former lawyer, Democratic congressman from New York (1857–61, 1893–95), and a controversial diplomat and Civil War general. On 27 February 1859 he fatally shot Francis Scott Key’s son on Pennsylvania Avenue, near the White House, because the younger Key had had an affair with his wife. Sickles was acquitted on the grounds of temporary insanity by a jury that shared the widespread public opinion that he had acted justifiably. This was the first time that the temporary-insanity defense was used. On the day of the shooting Clemens had arrived in St. Louis on the Aleck Scott, serving as a cub pilot under Bixby (“Steamboat Calendar,” L1, 388; Twichell 1874–1916, 2:117–18; New York Times: “Dreadful Tragedy,” 28 Feb 1859, 1; “The Sickles Tragedy,” 27 Apr 1859, 1; “The Acquittal of Mr. Sickles,” 28 Apr 1859, 4; “Gen. Sickles Dies; His Wife at Bedside,” 4 May 1914, 1).
Twichell was a chaplain in Sickles’s brigade in the Civil War] The regiment in which Twichell served as chaplain from 1861 to 1864 was part of the Excelsior Brigade commanded by Sickles, which saw action in several important battles (Twichell 2006, 1, 4).
The late Bill Nye . . . Wagner’s music is better than it sounds] Edgar Wilson (Bill) Nye (1850–96) was a journalist and then a popular humorist and lecturer. Clemens himself is often mistakenly credited with this remark.
Sickles lost a leg at Gettysburg . . . Twichell quoted that speech] The bloody Union victory at Gettysburg consumed the first three days of July 1863. Twichell described the battle in a letter of 5 July to his sister, Sarah Jane, in which he gave an account of Sickles that must have been very like the one he later gave to Clemens during one of their regular walks in the Hartford woods:
At a little before sunset the sad intelligence spread that Gen. Sickles was wounded. He had been the master-spirit of the day and by his courage, coolness and skill had averted a threatened defeat. All felt that his loss was a calamity. I met the ambulance in which he had been placed, accompanied it, helped lift him out, and administered the chloroform at the amputation. His right leg was torn to shreds, just below the knee—so low that it was impossible to save the knee. His bearing and words were of the noblest character. “If I die,” said he, “let me die on the field,” “God bless our noble cause,” “In a war like this, one man isn’t much,” “My trust is in God,” were some of the things he said. I loved him then, as I never did before. He has been removed, but we are informed that he is doing well. (Twichell 2006, 2, 249)
Joseph O’Hagan (1826–78), a Jesuit, was Twichell’s Catholic counterpart with Sickles’s Excelsior Brigade. He and Twichell remained close after the war (see 1 Feb 1875 to Stoddard, L6 , 367 n. 6).
There was General Fairchild . . . grew to be well acquainted with him and his family] Lucius Fairchild (1831–96) lost his left arm at Gettysburg on 1 July 1863. A few months later he was mustered out of the Union army with the rank of brigadier general. He subsequently served three terms as governor of Wisconsin (1866–72) and then entered the diplomatic service. One of his postings, from 1878 to 1880, was as the U.S. consul general in Paris. The Clemenses became friendly with him and his wife while living there, sometime between late February and early July 1879, during the European excursion that became the basis of A Tramp Abroad ( N&J2, 48, 287, 315–16).
General Noyes . . . lost a leg in the war] Edward Follansbee Noyes (1832–90) interrupted his law career in 1861 to join the Union army, rising to the rank of brigadier general. His left leg was amputated as a result of a wound he suffered in battle on 4 July 1864. After the war he served as a judge, as governor of Ohio (1871–73), and then as U.S. minister to France (1878–81).
Source documents.
TS1 (incomplete) Typescript, leaves numbered 111–22, 125 (all of 123 and most of 124 are missing), made from Hobby’s notes and revised: ‘Wednesday . . . sutlers got’ (287 title–290.39); ‘But I . . . have succeeded.’ (291.26–39).TS2 Typescript, leaves numbered 255–68, made from the revised TS1 and further revised.
TS4 Typescript, leaves numbered 514–28, made from the revised TS1.
NAR 14pf (lost) Galley proofs of NAR 14, typeset from the revised TS2 and further revised (conjecturally); now lost.
NAR 14 North American Review 184 (15 March 1907), 570–71: ‘Once . . . as that.’ (289.26–290.36).
The (nearly) two pages missing from TS1 were discarded by Paine when he edited the dictation for MTA. He preserved three lines from the bottom of page 124, which he pasted to the bottom of page 122, partially covering up three lines of text, which are nevertheless still legible. Hobby incorporated the revisions that Clemens made on TS1 into TS2, and they were incorporated into TS4 as well. TS4 has no authority for the text that survives in TS1. Where TS1 is missing, however, TS4 was collated and its one variant reported, because TS2 and TS4 derive independently from TS1 and therefore either may incorporate authorial readings not present in the other. When TS2 and TS4 agree, they confirm the readings of the missing portion of TS1.
Clemens revised TS2, in both ink and blue pencil, and selected an excerpt for publication in the NAR; there is no indication that Paine assisted him. The excerpt was cut away and sent to serve as printer’s copy for NAR 14, which also comprises the entire AD of 6 Dec 1906 and excerpts from the ADs of 17 Dec 1906, 11 Feb 1907, and 12 Feb 1907. His suppression of Twichell’s name, for which he substituted ‘Harris’, has been rejected here. The last sentence in the excerpt (‘Nothing so fortunate ever happened to Joe as that.’) was omitted from NAR 14. Although it is possible that Clemens deleted it on the lost NAR 14pf, it seems more likely that an NAR editor removed it to make the text fit on the last page of the installment; it has therefore been retained here. Other variants in NAR 14 suggest that Clemens made two substantive revisions. The first of these, the change from ‘begattings’ to ‘Begats’ (290.1), has been adopted. The second, the substitution of ‘uncle’s’ for ‘wife’s’ (290.5), has been rejected as a revision intended solely for contemporary publication.
Marginal Notes on TS2 Concerning Publication in the NAR