Explanatory Notes
Headnote
Apparatus Notes
Guide
MTPDocEd
Autobiographical Dictation, 6 August 1906 ❉ Textual Commentary

Source documents.

TS1      Typescript, leaves numbered 1001–8, made from Hobby’s notes and revised in pencil.
TS2      Typescript, leaves numbered 1001–7 (altered in ink to 1060–66), made from the revised TS1 and further revised.

Clemens’s revisions on TS1 are in pencil, unless otherwise noted. Several of them are designed to rephrase the matter of his income in general terms rather than specific dollar amounts. Because these revisions were carried out on a document not clearly intended for contemporary publication, they are adopted here. The original readings of TS1 will be found in the apparatus entries, and are quoted in the Explanatory Notes to this dictation.

TS2 was typed by Hobby from the revised TS1 and was further revised by Clemens. He deleted the summary paragraph and inserted ellipses before the first words of the text, suggesting a projected NAR excerpt, but no part of the dictation was published there.

[begin page 158]
Monday, August 6, 1906

Goes back to the failure of Charles L. Webster and Company—First meeting with H. H. Rogers—His sympathy, and assistance—Mr. Clemens in three years pays off a hundred cents on the dollar.textual note

Lettextual note us go back three months, now, and take up—no, let him wait. I could not do him justice this morning, for I feel at peace with all the human race. It is best to wait for a more favorable time. We must not be inadequate with that man—we must boil him in oilexplanatory note. I know I get these soft spells too often, but I was born so—I cannot change my disposition. By my count, estimating from the time when I began these dictations two years ago, in Italy, I have been in the right mood for competently and exhaustively feeding fat my ancient grudges in the cases of only thirteen deserving personsexplanatory note—one woman and twelve men. It makes good reading. Whenever I go back and re-readtextual note those little biographies and characterizations it cheers me up, and I feel that I have not lived in vaintextual note. The work was well done. The art of it is masterly. I admire it more and more every time I examine it. I do believe I have flayed and mangled and mutilated those people beyond the dreams of avarice.

Those chapters will not see print for fifty or seventy-five years to come—but that is no matter, mytextual note enjoyment was in the writing of them, not in the unhappiness they could afford to those people or their children. I should like to read them privately to those people, and I shall hope for that opportunity; buttextual note their families have done me no harm, and my heirs and assigns must not publish any of those chapters while any of the wives and children are still living. They have my permission to publish them after that. I don’t mind grandchildren and great-grandchildren, and they themselves won’t mind. I did not write those malignant chapters in malice entirelytextual note—a part of my motive was to do those people good. It seemed to me that if I could read the chapters to them privately it would go far to acclimate them for the Hereafter.

No, I could not do that man justice this morning. Let him go. I seem to be out of vitriol;textual note I suppose I have sprung a leaktextual note somewhere. I seem to be full of peace, affection, and the joy of life. Let us go back to history, and resume where we left off,textual note six or seven weeks ago, with the failure of Charles L. Webster and Company.textual note

My wife and I realized that we were really ruined this time, and quite completely. In my account, in a previous chapter,textual note of the many fortunes which I had for years been wasting in foolish speculations, I have not intimated that the lossestextual note ever seriouslytextual note embarrassed us, and indeed they did not. But the case was different now. In six or seven years Charles L. Webster and Companytextual note and James W. Paigetextual note the composing-machine adventurer, had between themtextual note swallowed up a quarter of a million dollars, half of it mine, half of it my wife’s. The great panic of ’93–’94textual note was on. Our incomes, like most other people’s, were crippled.textual note Moreover, we were under the heavy burden of debt left behind by the dead Webster firmexplanatory note. It was in these black days that I stumbled accidentally upon H. H. Rogers one evening in the lobby of the Murray Hill Hotel, whither Dr. Clarence C.textual note Riceexplanatory note and I [begin page 159] had gone on some errand or other, I do nottextual note now remember what. However, Henry Rogers interested himself in my troubles at once, and set himself the task of piloting me out of them. It was not a holiday job, for even a Standard Oil veteran; buttextual note his was a cool and capable head, and he was not disturbed by the complications and perplexities that were driving me toward insanity. It cost him several weeks of diligent hard work,textual note and one trip to Chicago, to pull me out of the Paige entanglement and set that matter permanently straight. It cost him fivetextual note years of intricate and bothersome work to pull me out of the Webster complications and abolish them out of my life for good and all.

Personallytextual note I never had anything to do with straightening out those involvedtextual note and vexatious Webster complexities. I sat around idle;textual note sometimes here, sometimes with the family in Europe, and latterly decorating the globe’s circumference with a garland of lectures, delivered in the interest of the Webster creditorsexplanatory note.textual note He did the whole of it himself. We were not legally liable for much oftextual note that great Webster indebtedness, but Mrs. Clemens and I considered ourselves morally liable for the whole of it,textual note and we believed that if I could havetextual note four years’ time I could earn enough to pay it all off attextual note a hundred cents on the dollar. I was only fifty-eight; I was in good repair; and we elected to pay a hundred cents. Now I wish to make particular note of this fact:textual note of all our business friends,textual note there was only one textual note who approved the hundred cents proposition,textual note encouraged us in it, and said “Hold your grip and go ahead.” That was Henry Rogers. Wetextual note held our grip and went ahead. In something short oftextual note three years we earned the money—textual noteforwarding it to Mr. Rogers as fast as we acquired it—and then we were out of debt. We had paid a hundred cents on the dollar, and owed no one a pennyexplanatory note.textual note

In the beginning Mrs. Clemens wanted to turn over her house to the creditors—textual noteland, furniture and all—a property which had cost more than a hundred and fifty thousand dollars, and which she had paid for out of her own pocket. She was determined to do this, but Mr. Rogers would not permit it—and of course I wouldn’t. It cost her a pang to relinquish that idea, but she was not able to help herself.

Itextual note have said in a previous chapter that at the meeting of Webster creditors Mr. Rogers insisted on making Mrs. Clemens a preferred creditor, and in giving her my copyrights in satisfaction of an indebtedness of sixty-five thousand dollarstextual note which she had lent to Webster and Company upon the firm’s notes, from time to time. Hetextual note secured his point, and the copyrights went to Mrs. Clemens. That was the far-sightedest thingtextual note Mr. Rogers hastextual note ever done for me. All values were flat at that time; no kind of property was salabletextual note; you couldn’t eventextual note give it away to a really bright and intelligent person. My books were no exception to the rule. They seemed permanently dead. I was not able to regard them as property. But Mr. Rogers stood to it that when the panic should be over they would revive, and would presently furnish a steady income and be as valuable as before.textual note It turned out that he was right.

Ittextual note is odd that he, a man of affairs, a purely business man, a man whose intellectual activities had been concerned all his life solely with finance and vast material commercial operations, should have been able to forecast with such certainty and such confidence the future of such a thing as a pile of paralysedtextual note old books. It is odd, and yet it is hardly surprising, for he carries a most remarkable head upon his shoulders, and it has long [begin page 160] ago ceased to surprisetextual note me when it does surprising things. I think he was the only person alive who considered those old books a valuable asset, but the result has verified his judgment. Within two or three years after the predictiontextual note the books had revived and hadtextual note begun to furnish my family an ample support; time has not diminished the figure, but enlarged it.textual note My wife and I couldtextual note have been persuaded to let the copyrights go; buttextual note nothing would have come of it, for Mr. Rogers would not have allowed the books to get away from us, and he is a very willful man.textual note He textual note is the reason that my literature affords a generous support for my childrenexplanatory note, and will continue to afford it after I am gone until the Government needs their bread and butter and takes it from them under the only dishonorable copyright law that exists upon the planet outside of England.textual notel

Textual Notes Monday, August 6, 1906
  Goes . . . and Company . . . three . . . a hundred . . . dollar. ●  Goes . . . & Co. . . . 3 . . . 100 . . . dollar—Mr. Clemens’s income from his books has been as high as 57,000 a year. (TS1)  Goes . . . & Co. . . . 3 . . . 100 . . . dollar—Mr. Clemens’s income from his books has been as high as 57,000 a year. ‘Mr. Clemens’s . . . a year.’ canceled on the typewriter; ‘Goes . . . dollar—’ canceled by SLC  (TS2-Hobby + SLC) 
  Let ●  Let (TS1)  . . . .Let (TS2-SLC) 
  re-read ●  re-read (TS1-SLC)  re-read (TS2) 
  lived in vain ●  lived in vain de ‘stet’ written in the margin  (TS1-SLC)  lived in vain (TS2) 
  matter, my ●  matter, . M my ‘M’ marked for lowercase with a slash and ‘l.c.’  (TS1-SLC)  matter, my (TS2) 
  opportunity; but ●  opportunity; . B but period mended to a semicolon; ‘B’ marked for lowercase with a slash and ‘l.c.’  (TS1-SLC)  opportunity; but (TS2) 
  entirely ●  entirely,  (TS1-SLC)  entirely (TS2) 
  vitriol; ●  vitriol. ; period mended to a semicolon  (TS1-SLC)  vitriol; (TS2) 
  a leak ●  a leak ‘aleak’ marked to insert space  (TS1-SLC)  a leak (TS2) 
  off, ●  off,  (TS1-SLC)  off, (TS2) 
  and Company. ●  & Co. (TS1, TS2) 
  account, in a previous chapter, ●  account, in a previous chapter,  (TS1-SLC)  account, in a previous chapter, (TS2) 
  the losses ●  they losses  (TS1-SLC)  the losses (TS2) 
  seriously ●  seriously  (TS1-SLC)  seriously (TS2) 
  and Company ●  and Co. (TS1, TS2) 
  James W. Paige ●  James W. Paige,  (TS1-SLC)  James W. Paige (TS2) 
  between them ●  between them  (TS1-SLC)  between them (TS2) 
  of ’93–’94 ●  not in  (TS1)  of ’93–’94  (TS2-SLC) 
  were crippled. ●  had stopped. were crippled.  (TS1-SLC)  were crippled. (TS2) 
  C. ●  C.  (TS1-SLC)  C. (TS2) 
  not ●  not not (TS1)  not (TS2) 
  veteran; but ●  veteran; . B but period mended to a semicolon; ‘B’ marked for lowercase with a slash and ‘l.c.’  (TS1-SLC)  veteran; but (TS2) 
  work, ●  work,  (TS1-SLC)  work, (TS2) 
  five ●  five (TS1)  five ‘four’ interlined above as an alternate reading, then deleted; query written and deleted in the margin  (TS2-SLC) 
  Personally ●  Personally  (TS1-SLC)  Personally (TS2) 
  involved ●  intricate involved  (TS1-SLC)  involved (TS2) 
  idle; ●  idle, ; comma mended to a semicolon  (TS1-SLC)  idle; (TS2) 
  lectures, delivered in the interest of the Webster creditors. ●  lectures. , delivered in the interest of the Webster creditors.  (TS1-SLC)  lectures, delivered in the interest of the Webster creditors. (TS2) 
  much of ●  much of  (TS1-SLC)  much of (TS2) 
  liable for the whole of it, ●  liable, for the whole of it,  (TS1-SLC)  liable for the whole of it, (TS2) 
  could have ●  should be granted could have  (TS1-SLC)  could have (TS2) 
  at ●  , at  (TS1-SLC)  at (TS2) 
  I wish to make particular note of this fact: ●  I wish to make particular note of this fact:  (TS1-SLC)  I wish to make particular note of this fact: (TS2) 
  friends, ●  friends,  (TS1-SLC)  friends, (TS2) 
  one  ●  one ‘one’ underscored  (TS1-SLC)  one  (TS2) 
  the hundred cents proposition, ●  this— , the hundred cents proposition,  (TS1-SLC)  the hundred cents proposition, (TS2) 
  We ●  So w We (TS1-SLC)  We (TS2) 
  something short of ●  something short of  (TS1-SLC)  something short of (TS2) 
  money— ●  money,  (TS1-SLC)  money— (TS2) 
  penny. ●  penny. [¶] During these last eight years I have been obliged to wince a little, now and then, at banquets, when speakers applauded me for paying a hundred cents when there was no legal occasion for it, and setting me away up alongside the honest great Sir Walter, for I knew that about nine-tenths of that applause belonged properly to Mrs. Clemens and Mr. Rogers. I am a weak sister, and I could probably have been persuaded to let the Webster assets pay what they could of the indebtedness and stop there. But no persuasions could ever have been compiled out of the dictionary that would have moved Mrs. Clemens for a moment to consent to that; and if she had needed any backing to hold her firm to her purpose, there was Mr. Rogers ready to furnish it.  (TS1-SLC)  not in  (TS2) 
  creditors— ●  creditors;  (TS1-SLC)  creditors— (TS2) 
  I ●  I think I (TS1-SLC)  I (TS2) 
  dollars ●  dollars cash  (TS1-SLC)  dollars (TS2) 
  He ●  He held his ground and  (TS1-SLC)  He (TS2) 
  thing ●  thing which  (TS1-SLC)  thing (TS2) 
  has ●  had s  (TS1-SLC)  has (TS2) 
  salable ●  saleable (TS1, TS2) 
  even ●  even (TS1)  not in  (TS2) 
  valuable as before. ●  good as bank stock. valuable as before.  (TS1-SLC)  valuable as before. (TS2) 
  right. [¶] It ●  right. It (TS1-SLC)  right. [¶] It (TS2) 
  paralysed ●  paralyzed (TS1, TS2) 
  surprise ●  be a surprise to  (TS1-SLC)  surprise (TS2) 
  years after the prediction ●  years, after the prophecy ediction  (TS1-SLC)  years after the prediction (TS2) 
  had ●  had  (TS1-SLC)  had (TS2) 
  furnish . . . enlarged it. ●  pay me twenty thousand dollars a year, and since that time they have not varied from that figure except when they have gone ten or twenty thousand above it. furnish the my family an ample support; time has not diminished the figure, but enlarged it.  (TS1-SLC)  furnish . . . enlarged it. (TS2) 
  could ●  might possibly could  (TS1-SLC)  could (TS2) 
  go; but ●  go. ; No, not my wife—but no doubt I could have been persuaded to it. However but period mended to a semicolon  (TS1-SLC)  go; but (TS2) 
  us, and he is a very willful man. ●  us. , and he is a very willful man.  (TS1-SLC)  us, and he is a very willful man. (TS2) 
  He  ●  He (TS1)  He ‘He’ underscored  (TS2-SLC) 
  affords . . . after I am gone until the Government . . . England. ●  has paid me as high as fifty-seven thousand dollars in a year, and will go well beyond that in the next twelve months, counting old books, new books, and magazine stuff. affords . . . after I am gone until the government . . . England.  (TS1-SLC)  affords . . . after I am gone until the Government . . . England. (TS2) 
Explanatory Notes Monday, August 6, 1906
 

Let us go back three months, now, and take up—no, let him wait . . . boil him in oil] Clemens never identifies this person. At the end of the Autobiographical Dictation of 7 August 1906 he calls him “No. 14 in the blatherskite gallery,” and once again postpones his indictment.

 

feeding fat my ancient grudges in the cases of only thirteen deserving persons] The Merchant of Venice, act 1, scene 3. For a conjectural list of the “deserving persons” see AutoMT1 , 22–23.

 

resume where we left off . . . debt left behind by the dead Webster firm] Clemens discusses his disastrous investments, the financial panic of 1893–94, and his debts in the Autobiographical Dictation of 2 June 1906.

 

I stumbled accidentally upon H. H. Rogers . . . Dr. Clarence C. Rice] Rice (1853–1935), who practiced medicine in New York City, became the Clemenses’ family physician in 1885, sometimes visiting them in Hartford. Clemens was a guest at Rice’s house at 123 East 19th Street at the start of his 1893–94 stay in New York. His claim that he and Rice “stumbled accidentally upon H. H. Rogers” is belied by contemporary correspondence: Rice brought them together deliberately. Clemens wrote of Rice to Olivia on 17 September 1893: “He told me he had ventured to speak to a rich friend of his who was an admirer of mine about our straits. I was very glad” (CU-MARK; Clarence C. Rice 1925; 1 May 1893 to OC, transcript by PAM in CU-MARK; N&J3, 332 n. 92).

 

decorating the globe’s circumference . . . in the interest of the Webster creditors] See the Autobiographical Dictation of 2 June 1906, note at 79.39–80.4, and the Autobiographical Dictation of 4 June 1906.

 

We had paid a hundred cents on the dollar, and owed no one a penny] In his original dictation Clemens admitted, “I am a weak sister, and I could probably have been persuaded to let the Webster assets pay what they could of the indebtedness and stop there. But no persuasions could ever have been compiled out of the dictionary that would have moved Mrs. Clemens.” He deleted the remark when revising his typescript (see the Textual Commentary at MTPO ).

 

the books had revived . . . generous support for my children] In the course of revising this account of his income from royalties, Clemens rewrote several sentences, substituting general terms for specific dollar amounts. In his original dictation he explained that his royalties soon amounted to “twenty thousand dollars a year,” and sometimes “ten or twenty thousand above it”; in fact, they were sometimes “as high as fifty-seven thousand dollars in a year, and will go well beyond that in the next twelve months, counting old books, new books, and magazine stuff” (see the Textual Commentary at MTPO ).