Explanatory Notes
Headnote
Apparatus Notes
Guide
MTPDocEd
Autobiographical Dictation, 23 August 1907 ❉ Textual Commentary

Source document.

TS1       Typescript, leaves numbered 3083–87 (altered in ink to 2183–87), made from Hobby’s notes and revised.

TS1 is the sole source for this dictation. On its first leaf, Paine, considering it for publication, noted in pencil ‘Probably not’.

Dictated Augusttextual note 23, 1907

Henniker Heatontextual note luncheon continued—Luncheon with George Bernard Shaw.

It was lively and interesting, was Mr. Henniker Heaton’stextual note luncheon—I mean the talk was—but we forgot all about the formidable world-questions which we were assembled [begin page 109] there to settle, and when we broke up and scattered homeward they had not been mentioned.

Ashcroft’s note:

“Wednesday, July 3. Luncheon with George Bernard Shawexplanatory note; dined with Moberly Bell.”textual note

Bernard Shaw has not completed his fifty-second year yet, and therefore is merely a lad. The vague and far-off rumble which he began to make five or six years ago is near-by now, and is recognizable as thunder. The editorial world lightly laughed at him during four or five of those years, but it takes him seriously now; he has become a force, and it is conceded that he must be reckoned with. Shaw is a pleasant man; simple, direct, sincere, animated;textual note but self-possessed, sane, and evenly poised, acute, engaging, companionable, and quite destitute of affectations. I liked him. He showed no disposition to talk about himself or his work, or his high and growing prosperities in reputation and the materialities;textual note but mainly—textual noteand affectionately and admiringly—textual notedevoted his talk to William Morris, whose close friend he had been,textual note and whose memory he deeply reveres. He again regretted that I had not known Morris, and again quoted Morris’s colossal encomium upon “Huck Finn”—things which Mr. Shaw had already said to me in a letterexplanatory note. The luncheon was in his own apartment, overlooking the Thames, and there were only three guests. Some of the talking was done by the three, for form’s sake, but we put the most of it upon Shaw, by preference, and to our own profit. One of the guests told me afterward that Shaw had had a troubled and discouraging and difficult time of it in acquiring a market for his literature in the beginning;textual note that in the first nine years he earned only six pounds—five for an ingeniously worded patent medicine advertisement, fifteen shillings for an article in an obscure journal, and five for a verse which he contributed to a child’s picture-book. He had been heard to say that he wrote the verse as a burlesque, and it was accepted seriously; adding “as many later writings of mine written seriously have been accepted as burlesques.”

There was a choice company at Moberlytextual note Bell’sexplanatory note, and by consequence it was a delightful evening. Mr. Bell is manager of the London Times, and therefore is in a sense deputy king of England. He has held this powerful office many years. Mrs. Clemens and I dined at his house many times when we were sojourning in London seven years ago. Those dinners were on a large scale; the guests numbered as many as forty; they were drawn from all ranks and were of all kinds and qualities, except the commonplace. At one of those gatherings there was a theatrical little episode: at Mr. Bell’s right sat a handsome and stately and richly dressed lady, a Continental princess*textual note of proud and ancient lineage—a person of special interest, at the time, for the reason that she had lately been making Cecil Rhodes’s life uncomfortableexplanatory note for him in South Africa, she declaring with energy and passion that he had proposed to her and been accepted, and had then retired from the engagement without pretext or excuse. Rhodes called these statements nonsense, and denounced them, both publicly and privately, as fabrications. The noise that ensued was great, and it traveled far; because of this,textual note the Princess was the centretextual note of interest at Mr.


* Radziwill. [begin page 110] Bell’s dinner that night. Among her ornaments was a long rope of very large and very fine pearls—the largest and finest and costliest to be found in England at the time, it was said. All the ladies present discussed them admiringly, and gazed upon them with fascinated eyes; by and by the string broke, and the great pearls gushed away in a brilliant freshet and went rolling and scattering everywhere. A dozen of the guests at that end of the table, together with the servants, hastened to seek and secure the gems and restore them to the Princess. She sat still and was not disturbed; as she received them she counted them, and finally pronounced the tale complete. Four hundred thousand dollars’ worth, and none missing! I heard one lady speak across the table to another and say,

“How could she be so cool and so calm? She was perfectly indifferent.”

The other answered, in a modified and confidential voice,

“She always breaks that string, and makes that display, when she has a good house—and besides, the real ones are in the bank; these are paste.”

Textual Notes Dictated August 23, 1907
  August ●  Aug. (TS1) 
  Henniker Heaton ●  Henniker-Heaton (TS1) 
  Henniker Heaton’s ●  Henniker-Heaton’s (TS1) 
  “Wednesday, July 3. Luncheon . . . Moberly Bell.” ●  “Wednesday July 3. Luncheon with George Bernard Shaw; dined with Mowberly Bell.” “Wednesday . . . Mowberly Bell.” underscored  (TS1-SLC) 
  animated; ●  animated, ; comma mended to a semicolon  (TS1-SLC) 
  materialities; ●  materialities, ; comma mended to a semicolon  (TS1-SLC) 
  mainly— ●  mainly,  (TS1-SLC) 
  admiringly— ●  admiringly,  (TS1-SLC) 
  had been, ●  was had been,  (TS1-SLC) 
  literature in the beginning; ●  literature; in the beginning;  (TS1-SLC) 
  Moberly ●  Mowberly marked to close up  (TS1-SLC) 
  princess* footnote: *Radziwill. ●  princess* footnote: * Radziwill.  (TS1-SLC) 
  this, ●  this,  (TS1-SLC) 
  centre ●  center (TS1) 
Explanatory Notes Dictated August 23, 1907
 

Luncheon with George Bernard Shaw] The luncheon was at Shaw’s flat in Adelphi Terrace; also present were Mrs. Shaw, Archibald Henderson, and Max Beerbohm (misidentified in the press as his half-brother, Herbert Beerbohm Tree) (Lathem 2006, 192–94).

 

William Morris . . . encomium upon “Huck Finn”—things which Mr. Shaw had already said to me in a letter] Shaw related William Morris’s opinion in a letter written just after this luncheon:

Once, when I was in Morris’s house, a superior anti-Dickens sort of man (sort of man that thinks Dickens no gentleman) was annoyed by Morris disparaging Thackeray. With studied gentleness he asked whether Morris could name a greater master of English. Morris promptly said “Mark Twain.” This delighted me extremely, as it was my own opinion; and I then found that Morris was an incurable Huckfinomaniac. This was the more remarkable, as Morris would have regarded the Yankee at the Court of King Arthur as blasphemy, and would have blown your head off for implying that the contemporaries of Joan of Arc could touch your own contemporaries in villainy. (Shaw to SLC, 3 July 1907, CU-MARK)

 

There was a choice company at Moberly Bell’s] C. F. Moberly Bell (1847–1911), manager of the London Times since 1890, had been instrumental in arranging Clemens’s Oxford degree—or so Clemens believed. Clemens wrote him on 3 May 1907, “Your hand is in it! & you have my best thanks. Although I wouldn’t cross an ocean again for the price of the ship that carried me, I am glad to do it for an Oxford degree” (CU-MARK, in MTL , 2:806).

 

in London seven years ago . . . had lately been making Cecil Rhodes’s life uncomfortable] Princess Catherine Radziwill (1858–1941), descended from impoverished Polish nobility, first tried to attach herself to Cecil Rhodes in 1899, when she followed him from London to the Cape Colony. She seems to have started rumors that she was his mistress and that he had proposed marriage. The princess was in London from April to June 1900; the Clemenses probably met her at Moberly Bell’s on 4 May. She returned to South Africa shortly thereafter, continuing her pursuit of Rhodes. When he died suddenly in 1902, she was on trial for forging his signature; she was convicted and served sixteen months in prison (Roberts 1969, 179–225, 361, and passim; Notebook 43, TS p. 9, CU-MARK).