Explanatory Notes        Apparatus Notes ()
This text has been superseded by a newly published text
MTPDocEd
To Moncure D. Conway
26 February 1876 • Hartford, Conn. (MS: NNC, UCCL 01310)
(SUPERSEDED)
My Dear Conway:1explanatory note

Good! & many thanks to you & Mrs Conway. When you come under our roof on the 9th we’ll fix the thing up & become London publishers of humorous & anthological literature.2explanatory note And I must tell the Hookers to drop in & meet you, they were so vastly delighted with your lectures.3explanatory note

I have entirely recovered at last, but shall not go to work for a month yet. Susie has had a tilt with the dipththe emendation diphtheria & beat it upwards of 40 points in 60.4explanatory note Which I will do for you when you come. Mrs Clemens is tolerably well & we both send kindest regards.

Ys sincerely
S. L. Clemens

The Elmira Y. M. C. A. sent me an “explanation” of their conduct toward you—to which I replied through my brother-in-law Mr. Crane, suggesting that they cease “explaining” & pleading the Baby Act, & try paying their bills honestly for a change.5explanatory note

Textual Commentary
Previous Publication:

MicroPUL, reel 1.

Provenance:

The Conway Papers were acquired by NNC sometime after Conway’s death in 1907.

More information on provenance may be found in Description of Provenanceclick to open link.

Explanatory Notes
1 

Clemens answered the following letter (CU-MARK):

My dear Clemens,

Having just come from the great Fancy-Martha-Washington-Costume-Centennial ball at the Opera House, wherewith the Queen City is tonight doing homage to G. W. and the Eagle,—I sit down simply to put in an envelope the enclosed letter received by my wife from Chatto & Windus, & forwarded by her to me. If there be anything further that pressing time suggests shd be done before we meet (on March 9th a.m.) you had better write to me to care of W P Conway Esq Fredericksburg Virginia.

I shall leave Fredericksburg in time to give a lecture in Hartford on March 8. That night I shall have to pass with the Cornwalls, but next morning I propose, if you will allow me, to come to your house

I sail on the 11th

Remember me heartily to your wife.

Ever yours
M D Conway

Conway’s enclosure was from an unidentified Chatto and Windus staff member (CU-MARK):

chatto & windus publishers 74 & 75 piccadilly.
W
Dear Madame

We shall be happy to undertake the publication of Mark Twain’s new work upon the terms suggested by you this morning—viz. that he should bear the entire cost of production, and pay us a royalty of 10 per cent upon the entire amount of sales. With the exception of this 10%, we pay over the ent whole proceeds of sales to Mark Twain.

Yours very truly
Chatto [&] Windus
                                              F.J.H.
   

Ellen Conway had approached Chatto and Windus after receiving the following letter from her husband, written while he was visiting the Clemenses (MoFlM):

Mark Twain has written a remarkable book called “Tom Sawyer”, about which I wish you to try your hand in preparing the way for negotiations with Chatto & Windus. He (Mark T.) would like to follow our plan—pay for the manufacture of his own book and pay the publisher for each copy sold. You had better arrange by letter to have Andrew Chatto come to see you, as he will be glad to do that if you say in a note addressed to him (with Esq. after it!) that it relates to a new book by Mark Twain. If Chatto wishes to know it you can inform him that Mr Clemens (Mark T) is under no obligation legal or moral to Routledge who for some time has been publishing his works; and that Routledge has no ground whatever upon which he could object to any other publisher being contracted with by the Author. You can also inform Chatto that the story is very important & illustrated with 150 engravings, & that plates can be sent over in at once for the early May publication. You can tell Chatto that I suggested him to Clemens provided his firm is willing to publish on the plan mentioned. And if they incline to that let them state to you to be transmitted to me what they think will be a fair royalty for them—Clemens paying everything in the way of manufacture & advertising. Of course you can go to see Chatto if that strikes you as preferable, by appointment. You must avoid giving to the interview any force beyond a consultation; there should be nothing for the present in the way of a contract or a promise to let Chatto have the book. If Chatto inclines to anything else than the suggested arrangement, you will listen, take down what he says, and let me know at once. When I come over in March I shall bring the Manuscript (of which two copies exist) with me. It is probable that two editions will have to be issued, one cheap. Address as usual at the Literary Bureau

Your loving husband
M D Conway

In his letters Conway alluded to the “Centennial Continental Costume Party” held at Pike’s Opera House in Cincinnati on Washington’s birthday, 22 February, as a benefit for the Mount Vernon Association. According to the Cincinnati Enquirer, the pageant and dance, at which the participants wore historical ball costumes and military uniforms, was “the most notable society event in Cincinnati’s history, and before its splendor the ball to the Prince of Wales pales in splendor.” Conway also mentioned his father, Walker Peyton Conway (1804–84), a Virginia landowner, legislator, and judge; Horace Cornwall (1818–1904), former Connecticut state’s attorney and United States district attorney, and an officer of the Unitarian Society, sponsor of Conway’s Hartford lectures; his wife, Lucy Deming Cornwall (d. 1883); Andrew Chatto (1840–1913), who had joined the publishing firm of Clemens’s old enemy, John Camden Hotten, at the age of fifteen, then had purchased the firm in 1873 and taken poet W. E. Windus as his partner; George Routledge and Sons, publishers of the authorized English editions of The Innocents Abroad, Roughing It, The Gilded Age, and three volumes of Mark Twain’s sketches; and, evidently, the American Literary Bureau, a New York lecture agency (Cincinnati Enquirer: “Amusements,” 22 Feb 76, 5; “Our Meschienza,” 23 Feb 76, 8; Southern Plantation Records 2006; Hartford Courant: “Marriages,” 4 Jan 47, 2; “The Unitarian Society,” 17 May 75, 2; “Deaths,” 14 July 83, 2; “Obituary. Horace Cornwall,” 18 Nov 1904, 6; Osborne and Gerencser 2003; Trumbull 1886, 1:117–18; Weedon 2004; Schneller 1991, 111; L5 , 163–68, 321; SLC 1872).

2 

Conway’s letters dealt only with Tom Sawyer , but Chatto and Windus had already published one piece of “anthological literature.” In 1874 they had issued The Choice Humorous Works of Mark Twain, which Clemens revised from Hotten’s unauthorized 1873 edition (see ET&S1 , 602–7; SLC 1873, SLC 1874).

3 

The three lectures Conway had delivered in Hartford in January (see 5 Jan 1876 to Conwayclick to open link, n. 2). Isabella Beecher Hooker, the prominent Hartford spiritualist and feminist, and her husband, John, a lawyer, were close friends and neighbors of the Clemenses’. Conway was scheduled to return to Hartford for lectures on 8 and 9 March on “Impressions of London” and “Heroes and Dragons,” respectively. He spent the first night there with the Cornwalls before going on to the Clemenses’ home (Hartford Courant: “Mr. Conway’s Lectures,” 6 Mar 76, 2; “Impressions of London,” 9 Mar 76, 2; “Heroes and Dragons,” 10 Mar 76, 2).

4 

Evidently a billiards metaphor. Clemens and Conway played when Conway visited Hartford (see 9 Apr 76 to Conwayclick to open link, n. 1, and L6 , 600 n. 2).

5 

Here Clemens replied to the following letter (CU-MARK):

chatto & windus publishers 74 & 75 piccadilly.
galt house j. p. johnson manager
louisville, ky. Feb 9 187 6
My dear Clemens,

I have been for some days haunted by paragraphs in the papers saying that Mark Twain is about to take a blue trip ship—alas, what am I writing, that you mean to go to England, to “lecture in London in May and June,” etc. Is there real substance in this rumour?

—Have you not an influential acquaintance in Elmira, New York, who would find it convenient in passing the imposing and imposturing rooms of the Young Men’s Christian Association and find out whether they really do mean to defraud me out of the $25 which they owe me? The contract was to lecture for $125; it is not denied; but they said they had embarrassments, and being one to three I could not get out of them more than $100. They are now coming the dodge of not answering letters. If they do not pay I shall certainly sue them if only to publish their meanness.

Heartiness to Mrs Clemens & the young ones.

Ever yours
M D Conway

This will reach you on Sat., and if you will write then or next day to me, care of Rev. Jno F. Effinger St Paul, Minn, I shall get it. If you write on Monday or Tuesday address Care Rev Robt Collyer 500 La Salle Chicago

In his opening sentence Conway alluded playfully to Clemens’s “A Literary Nightmare.” Clemens is not known to have planned a spring 1876 lecture engagement in London. Conway had delivered his lecture on “Oriental Religions; Their Origin and Progress,” to a sparse audience, in the Young Men’s Christian Association course in Elmira on 20 December 1875. No communications between Clemens, Theodore Crane, and the Elmira Y.M.C.A. regarding the association’s “pleading the Baby Act” (that is, acting childishly) about Conway’s fee are known to survive. John F. Effinger, (1835–1902), a Unitarian, was minister of St. Paul’s Unity Church. The Reverend Robert Collyer (1823–1912) was a well-known Chicago Unitarian clergyman (not to be confused with Robert Laird Collier [1837–90], another Unitarian clergyman who served in Chicago). (Elmira Advertiser: “City and Neighborhood,” 13 Dec 75, 4; “Moncure D. Conway,” 21 Dec 74, 5; L6 , 600 n. 1; Mathews 1951, 1:55; L5 , 82 n. 4).

Emendations and Textual Notes
  dipththe  ●  dipththe- |