Explanatory Notes        Apparatus Notes ()
This text has been superseded by a newly published text
MTPDocEd
To Frank M. Etting
8 June 1876 • Hartford, Conn. (Sales catalog: American Art Association,
16 April 1925, lot 26; and Brownell 1944, p. 5, UCCL 01339)
(SUPERSEDED)
Dear Sir—emendation

Iemendation have sketched Francis Lightfoot Lee, &emendation it was my purpose to come to Philadelphia the first week in July (as was, I believe, the suggestion of your general circular).1explanatory note emendation But I (as do others of our guild,emendation) find myself in doubt as to what is expected or what is to be done. Can you resolve these doubts for me?

For instance:emendation Are emendation the several authors to go to Philadelphia? Are they to read theiremendation several sketches themselves? Or are they not to be read at all, but simply filed?emendation

Ifemendation the authorsemendation are to come in person,emendation I would mainlyemendation desire to learn if you know, by their promises,emendation that any considerable number of them will be present. Itemendation will not be easy for me to go to Philadelphia &emendation therefore ifemendation I can fulfil my Centennial duty byemendation sending my MSemendation to you &emendation remaining home, I would like that. There are doubtless authors in your list whom I would willingly travel to Philadelphia to see, but then, they may not be there.2explanatory note

J. Hammond Trumbull told me yesterday that the day you have set will fall on a Sunday—but that was caused by a misprinted calendar, I suppose.3explanatory note

With great respect
                                     I am
                                       Yrs Trulyemendation
Sam.emendation L. Clemens
                                       (Mark Twain.emendation)
Textual Commentary
Previous Publication:

Wholihan 1949, 2:21.

Provenance:

Collection of “the late William F. Gable,” offered for sale by the American Art Association in April 1925.

More information on provenance may be found in Description of Provenanceclick to open link.

Explanatory Notes
1 

The circular has not been recovered. It presumably accompanied the invitation to participate in Philadelphia’s centennial celebration that Clemens received in February (see 23 Feb 76 to Ettingclick to open link).

2 

Clemens was the best known of the authors of the 156 papers—each “a brief biographical sketch of one of the Signers of the Declaration of Independence, or of some other prominent Revolutionary patriot”—prepared for the 1 July event. That day many of the authors “were unable, through illness or other engagements to be present, but had sent their sketches” (“Centennial Anniversary,” Philadelphia Public Ledger, 3 July 76, 1). Clemens did attend, however, persuaded by Etting’s 18 June reply to the present letter (see 20? June 76 to Trumbullclick to open link, 24 June 76 to Stokleyclick to open link, 14 Sept 76 to Fairbanksclick to open link). Clemens’s “Francis Lightfoot Lee” was published in 1877 in the Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography (SLC 1876, SLC 1877).

3 

The celebration originally had been scheduled for Sunday, 2 July 1876, the actual centennial of the Colonial Congress’s resolution of independence, but was moved up one day.

Emendations and Textual Notes

All variants between the source texts are reported below. Adopted readings followed by ‘(MTP)’ are editorial emendations of the source readings.

  Hartford June 8 (#MTP)  ●  Hartford June 8 [1876?] reported, not quoted  (#P1)  Hartford, June 8 (1877) (#P2) 
  Dear Sir— (#P2)  ●  salutation not in  (#P1) 
  [¶] I (#P2)  ●  [no ¶] I (#P1) 
  & (#P1)  ●  and (#P2) 
  July (as was, I believe, the suggestion of your general circular). (#P2)  ●  July. . . . parenthetical remark not in, replaced by three ellipses  (#P1) 
  guild, (#P1)  ●  guild (#P2) 
  Can you resolve these doubts for me? [¶] For instance: (#P2)  ●  . . . nine words not in, replaced by three ellipses  (#P1) 
  Are  (#P2)  ●  Are (#P1) 
  their (#P1)  ●  the (#P2) 
  Or are they not to be read at all, but simply filed? (#P2)  ●  . . . sentence not in, replaced by three ellipses  (#P1) 
  [¶] If (#P1)  ●  [no ¶] If (#P2) 
  authors (#P2)  ●  Authors (#P1) 
  person, (#P1)  ●  person (#P2) 
  mainly (#P2)  ●  . . . word not in, replaced by three ellipses  (#P1) 
  know, by their promises, (#P1)  ●  know by their promises (#P2) 
  [no ¶] It (#P1)  ●  [¶] It (#P2) 
  & (#P1)  ●  and (#P2) 
  if (#P2)  ●  . . . word not in, replaced by three ellipses  (#P1) 
  by (#P2)  ●  . . . word not in, replaced by three ellipses  (#P1) 
  MS (#P2)  ●  Manuscript (#P1) 
  you & (#MTP)  ●  you and (#P2)  you. . . . (#P1) 
  remaining home . . . Truly (#P2)  ●  remainder of paragraph, next paragraph, and complimentary close not in  (#P1) 
  Sam. (#MTP)  ●  Sam’l (#P2)  Saml. (#P1) 
  Twain. (#P1)  ●  Twain (#P2)