Explanatory Notes        Apparatus Notes ()
This text has been superseded by a newly published text
MTPDocEd
To Moncure D. Conway
per Fanny C. Hesse
29 December 1876 • Hartford, Conn. (MS: NNC, UCCL 01397)
(SUPERSEDED)
Dear Conway1explanatory note

Hart and I have written a play, the chief character in which, is a Chinaman, and we have leased it for life to a man who will play that part.

We give him sole right for the entire world. When he plays in England, his contract will bind him to pay to us our shares of the profit, & is our ample security that far. It would be well for him, & for us to have the play protected there by copywrightemendation, but I hardly see how it is to be done. I think he is the best Chinaman that ever stepped on a stage. So I want no public representation of it in England, until he produces it there himself.

Couldn’t it be covered by a private representation in your back yard, by people who read their parts instead of recited them?

I promise to simultane Atlantic articles in Temple Bar, but I have always forgotten to do it, exceptemendation in a single instance. I had abundant time to do it in the case of this last Atlantic article, but as usual never thought of it, until it was too late. So I threw away2explanatory note

one or more MS pages missing

the 3. 10, for telegrams & things, and send me a bill of exchange for the rest at your convenience.

Behold the trouble you have made by sending Mrs Clemens the article about finger rings! She has long ago lost, or given away, a volume which exhaustively treated the subject of finger rings, the customs, traditions & superstitions, appertaining to them in all lands, and now she is suffering for that book. She had forgotten her loss until you reminded her of it. Now you tell Chatto to hunt up a copy of that book and send it here, and charge it to me, and you shall be forgiven.

Ever thine
Sam L. Clemens
                                         pr F. C. H
Textual Commentary
Previous Publication:

MicroPUL, reel 1.

Provenance:

The Conway Papers were acquired by NNC sometime after Conway’s death in 1907.

More information on provenance may be found in Description of Provenanceclick to open link.

Explanatory Notes
1 

Clemens replied to the following letter (CU-MARK):

My dear Clemens

A paragraph in the Cin. Commercial says “Mark Twain and Bret Harte are said to be writing a play together.” If ever you write a play again be sure to arrange to have it copyrighted here and brought out on the same night that it is brought out in America. For it was yesterday decided in the Courts against Dion Boucicault that his copyright to the Shaugran in England was worthless because the play was first brought out in America. This decision ends your hope, I fear, of protecting Col. Sellers here—though I do not yet absolutely know whether the English copyright of the Gilded Age could protect it. I am pretty sure not. I’ll inquire. I have learned that there is no engagement between the Haymarket and Raymond yet—but only a faint rumour that he is coming. I have very good authority for believing that the present piece ‘Dan’l Druce’, which is having a great success, will run on their until Easter, and that it is expected that after that Pygmalion and Galatea will be reproduced. If Raymond comes it will be just after that—he might try to hit the May and June season.

Chatto has not failed to notice that you have in the last Atlantic an article for which he would have given money.

I send you Chatto & Windus account for the first edition of Tom Sawyer, according to our agreement for 1s9d per copy. The 82 remaining copies will no doubt soon disappear. The telegrams sent you by me are not included, of course, and I am sorry to say my books are confused about these said telegrams—as well as I can make out they amount to £2..11..0, which with 16s paid for carriage of picture plates and telegrams to Chatto in emergencies, would amount to about £3..10..0. But this is subject to your recollection of the telegrams I sent you, and need not be considered of importance. Chatto has sent me with enclosed account a bill of acceptance for the sum of £157..13..10. It is as stated in the account due four months after date, or on April 17. My banker will probably cash it for me next week, as a favour, and I shall be glad to know if you would like me to buy a bill of exchange and send it to you at once. Apart from the side expenses & minus 60 free copies to press &c you will see that the 2000 copies when completely sold bring to author’s account £169..14..2, which must be nearly $900 in greenbacks (at a momentary guess.) I think on the whole and in the long run this is rather better than if you had invested in printing the book at your own expense, with so much less chance of moderating the fancy of printers than a publisher has.

I send you a clipping from the Newcastle Chronicle which will show you that you are doing your part in mitigating the Sublime Porte. You ought to man (but don’t suspect the phrase of alluding to Ottoman) another pilgrim ship, load it heavily with grape (not that of which Porte is made) and anchor off Constantinople as the boss for us (I protest against any insult in misunderstanding of my words.)

Thine
Conway

Mrs Clemens may like the attached fingerring lore

In addition to the unidentified Cincinnati Commercial paragraph, Conway alluded to: Dion Boucicault’s popular play The Shaughraun (“The Vagabond”), which had opened at Wallack’s Theatre in New York in November 1874; W. S. Gilbert’s Dan’l Druce, Blacksmith , which had opened at the Haymarket Theatre in London on 11 September 1876; and Gilbert’s Pygmalion and Galatea , which began its original run at the Haymarket Theatre on 9 December 1871. John T. Raymond took Colonel Sellers to London in 1880 (see 24 July 76 to Conwayclick to open link, n. 4). The enclosed Chatto and Windus statement for the period 29 May–14 December 1876 showed earnings of 162 pounds, 10 shillings, 8 pence, or about $813, on sales of the English edition of Tom Sawyer, from which were deducted charges for proof sheets, for telegrams to Clemens and to Belford Brothers in Toronto, for transfer of the English copyright (see 2 Nov 76 to Conwayclick to open link, nn. 2, 3), and for two copies of the book, bringing the net amount owed Clemens to 157 pounds, 13 shillings, 10 pence, or about $788. The enclosed clipping from the Newcastle Chronicle does not survive and has not been identified. The “attached fingerring lore” evidently was “Finger Ring Lore,” an unidentified clipping discussing William Jones’s Finger-Ring Lore: Historical, Legendary, Anecdotal (London: Chatto and Windus, 1877). It survives in one of Clemens’s scrapbooks (Scrapbook 8:2–3, CU-MARK; L6 , 388 n. 3; Gilbert and Sullivan Archive 2006).

2 

For the “single instance,” see 6 July 76 to Bentleyclick to open link, n. 2. Clemens’s “last Atlantic article,” which he may have enclosed for Conway, was “The Canvasser’s Tale,” published in the December number. Andrew Chatto would have published it simultaneously in his Belgravia magazine (see 2 Nov 76 to Conwayclick to open link, n. 3; SLC 1876).

Emendations and Textual Notes
  copywright ●  sic
  except ●  exceppt