Explanatory Notes        Apparatus Notes ()

Source: CU-MARK ([CU-MARK])

Cue: "Your splendid letter"

Source format: "MS"

Letter type: "[standard letter]"

Notes:

Last modified:

Revision History: AB

Published on MTPO: 2007

Print Publication: v3

MTPDocEd
To Elisha Bliss, Jr.
12 August 1869 • Buffalo, N.Y. (MS: CU-MARK, UCCL 00330)
Friend Bliss—

Your splendid letter has arrived, & I confess I owe you one. I was in an awful sweat when I wrote you, for everything seemed going wrong end foremost with me. I had just got mad with the Cleveland Herald folks & broken off all further negotiations for a purchase, & so I let you & some others have the benefit of my ill nature. But emendation that is all gone by, & now we will b smoke the pipe of peace & bury the hatchet.1explanatory note I have bought one-third of the Buffalo “Express,”2explanatory note & it is an exceedingly thriving newspaper.3explanatory note We propose to make it more so. I expect I shall have to buckle right down to it & give up lecturing until next year.

I was at Elmira yesterday & saw the book, & my faith in it has all come back again. It is the very handsomest book of the season & you ought to be proud of your work. It will sell. Between emendation us we will make it sell. Miss Langdon has a very flattering letter about it from young Mrs. Perkins of Hartford. I will get a copy & send to you. They live in that big place at the foot of the street that starts from the front of the Episcopal church.4explanatory note Send emendation Henry Ward Beecher a copy. However, I believe I put his name in that list. I will send you the Elmira notices when they appear. I gave that handsome gilt-edged copy to my sweetheart5explanatory note—I wish you would send one like it to Charley J. Langdon, Elmira, & one to my mother, Mrs. Jane Clemens, 203 South 16th street, St. Louis, Mo. I have no copy myself, but I can get along without, have having emendation already perused it. I think it would be a good idea to send both bound & unbound copies to the Buffalo Express, the Buffalo Courier, & the Buffalo Commercial, but that is for you to judge of.6explanatory note

Well, I believe I haven’t anything more to say, except that I like the circulars,7explanatory note I like the book, I like you & your style & your business vim, & believe the chebang will be a success.

Heartily & sincerely
Sam. L. Clemens.

“Buffalo Express” is my address hereafter—shall marry & come to anchor here during the winter.

letter docketed:Clemens andand Mark Twain | Aug 12/69

Textual Commentary
12 August 1869 • To Elisha Bliss, Jr.Buffalo, N.Y.UCCL 00330
Source text(s):

MS, Mark Twain Papers, The Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley (CU-MARK).

Previous Publication:

L3 , 291–295; MTMF 102, excerpt; MTLP , 25–26.

Provenance:

see Mendoza Collection, p. 587. Two typed transcriptions, at WU and ViU, may have been made by George Brownell or Dana Ayer from a lost handwritten transcription by Ayer. See Brownell Collection, pp. 581–82.

More information on provenance may be found in Description of Provenanceclick to open link.

Explanatory Notes
1 

Bliss’s “splendid letter” (CU-MARK) was the detailed response he had promised to Clemens’s 22 July accusations:

agents wanted for standard works.          office american publishing company,

s. drake, pres’t.                          no. 149 asylum street,

e. bliss, jr., sec’y.

f e bliss, treas                              hartford, conn., Aug 4 th 186 9

Friend Clemens

Yours of 1st is at hand, enclosing comments from Trumbull. That is all O.K. He has been in to see me 2 or 3 times. We shall use the letter in a very quiet way occasionally—privately not publicly, but where it will do, to show a part of it—& get a good effect from it—I enclose you a few of our Circulars &c—& you will see we have got our machinery in operation We have just commenced in town here & as far as we can see or hear the thing takes first rate—We believe the Book will be a success & will disappoint you, if, as you said in your last you had lost all hopes of its meeting with a large sale—I have been intending to reply fully to your last letter—but must say, that I could not get myself into the right humor for it. I felt very much annoyed & hurt, at what was therein written, as I had not dreamed such a construction was placed upon what I was doing. I do not wish to go over the ground unless it is necessary—I know not where you got the idea we was to make a late fall Book of it. I have never sd so I only proposed delaying the opening of the Ball for a week or two until haying & harvesting was over. The i.e., To show you how absolutely dull July is I will add that we shipd but 1300 Books all told last month—

I will only refer to one subject statement in yours which was that the Book was to be out peremptorily on the 1st of Aug. 1868—Now you will recollect you arrived in N.Y from Cal. on the 25th of July, & only placed the Mss. in our hands sometime in Aug. & therefore you could not certainly expect the Book to be published before we had the Mss! The first delay, was in order to give us time to illustrate it not to give room for Grant as that book would be past by time we could possibly have got out yours. The Metropolis was got out not to work against a rival house or to make business out of their capital but to fill in som between Grant & your Book in the Spring, while we were lying still as it were—

The delay this spring, has been by the great quantity of illustrations put in & other causes. You must know that I tried hard to get it out early as possible—I did not sham it—Failing to get it early in the season—I held to my sentiments always believed in that the first of the season is the best time to bring out a book—therefore for the past 2 months I have held back as it were on it—rather than pressed it, in order to take the flood tide for the Book—

It has been done solely with a view to the interest of the Book, on which I personally have risked almost my sagacity reputation for judgment & sagacity for knowing what will sell—Nothing has been before it in my mind, & I did not suppose you dreamed there was. Everything looks prosperous now & the cold water bath you gave me in your last has perhaps been refreshing after all—so I dont lay up anything, you said—only hope you will hereafter, if you want to say such things to me again, just come out plain & call me a d—d cheat & scoundrel—which will really it seems to me cover the whole ground & be a great deal more brief. Now lets let the thing drop & sell the Book—Thats what we want to do. We propose now to send out from 1 to 2,000 copies to Editors at once, with advts. without limit & hope if, you have a shot in your locker to spare, you will now pour on a broadside—& lets put the thing through sharply. Please write me often & send me all the notices you see in papers &c—The Books to Elmira were sent by Ex. from here to N.Y. then by same Ex. to “Mark Twain” Esq Have you got them yet. I mail you some slips also to day look for them

truly

Bliss

Despite Clemens’s eagerness to make peace with Bliss and his apparent acceptance of Bliss’s explanation, he persisted in his mistaken belief that the publication delay was thirteen months (from July 1868). In 1876 he told William Wright (Dan De Quille): “I have been through that mill (of ‘When is your book going to be out?’) so often that it long ago ceased to have any power to annoy me—though when the ‘Innocents’ was in press I confess I wished a million times that I had never written a book. . . . Bliss never yet came within 4 months of getting a book out at the time he said he would. On the Innocents he fell short overstepped his word & his contract 13 months—& I suffered questioning all that time” (SLC to Wright, 28 Jan 76click to open link). And in 1903, he asserted: “In August of that year 1869, the Company having during 13 months tried all kinds of ways to get out of publishing ‘The Innocents Abroad,’ (the late Mr. Sidney Drake begging me, as a charity, to take the book away, because it was not serious enough and could finish the destruction of the Company), I telegraphed from Elmira that I would bring suit if the book was not on sale in 24 hours. So it was issued, without a canvasser under engagement, a year after the subject of it had passed out of public interest, and had to be revived—if possible—by the book itself” (SLC 1903, 1–2). Actually, however, Clemens was misremembering his March ultimatum (see 13 Mar 69 to Fairbanks, n. 5click to open link). As the present letter and Clemens’s 1 August letter to Bliss make clear, no August confrontation took place. Nor has any record of the threatening telegram Clemens recalled been found.

2 

The purchase, for $25,000, was not yet complete. On 13 August John D. F. Slee, business agent and salesman for the Anthracite Coal Association in Buffalo, wrote Clemens: “In response to my letter of yesterday I have Telegram from Mr. Langdon saying he will send check to-day for $7500#—This will doubtless reach us by tomorrow mornings mail—I will give you check for $5000# makeing the $12,500—. . . will it not be well for you and Mr. Kennett to call and execute those papers this afternoon, leaving them in trust with Mr. Rogers until Mr. Kennet has his money—Say to him I expect to be ready with the funds tomorrow morning” (CU-MARK). To this loan from Jervis Langdon, Clemens added $2,500 of his own to complete the down payment—drawing $2,445 of it on 20 August from his cash account with Slote, Woodman and Company in New York (“Mr S. L. Clemens in a/c and Interest a/c to Jany 1st 1870 with Slote Woodman & Co.,” CU-MARK). The seller, Thomas Aiguier Kennett (1843–1911), a graduate of Yale and an experienced newspaperman, had bought his interest in the Express in 1866, becoming vice-president of the Express Printing Company. After selling out to Clemens, he joined a firm of stockbrokers in New York, and then, from 1873 until the end of his life, he edited trade journals such as the Carpet and Upholstery Trade Review and the Decorator and Furnisher. The Buffalo law firm of Dennis Bowen and Sherman S. Rogers handled the financial transaction between Kennett and Clemens and may have drawn up the new Express partnership agreement as well (Frank H. Severance, 334; “Editor Kennett Dead,” New York Times, 30 June 1911, 9; Buffalo Directory, 234).

3 

The Buffalo Express, according to its masthead “the official paper of the city,” was a Republican daily and weekly (issuing Thursdays) established in 1846 by Almon M. Clapp (1811–99). When the Express Printing Company was formed in 1866, Clapp’s partners were his son, Harry H. Clapp, Josephus N. Larned, George H. Selkirk, and Thomas A. Kennett. The Clapps sold their interest to the remaining partners in April 1869, four months before Clemens bought Kennett’s share. Although the Express did not publish circulation figures, its distribution, which reached Toronto and parts of Pennsylvania and Ohio, suggests that it was indeed “thriving” (Frank H. Severance, 224–25; Rowell, 66; Gregory, 445; Buffalo Directory, 252; “Valedictory,” Buffalo Express, 3 Apr 69, 2; “The Express,” Buffalo Express, 23 Apr 69, 2).

4 

Lucy Maria (Adams) Perkins (1833–93) was the wife of Charles Enoch Perkins (1832–1917), a cousin of Olivia’s friend Alice Hooker Day. Her flattering letter has not been found. The Perkins house, on Woodland Street, was at the foot of Niles Street; Trinity Episcopal Church, on Sigourney Street, was at the head. In the 1870s, after Clemens and Olivia settled in Hartford, Charles Perkins was their lawyer (Geer 1869, map facing 29, 214, 264, 477; “Nook Farm Genealogy,” 22, Beecher Addenda, ii–iv; “Hartford Residents,” Adams Family, 3).

5 

Clemens signed the flyleaf the following month: “To Miss Livy Langdon ǀ From Sam. L. Clemens. ǀ Sept., 1869.” In 1906, he appended a note, which said in part, “This was doubtless the first copy issued from the press” (Christie 1988, lot 1166).

6 

For the Buffalo press’s response to Innocents, see 27 Sept 69 to Bliss, n. 4click to open link.

7 

The revised version of the advertising circular that Clemens had acknowledged a month before: see 12 July 69 to Bliss, n. 1click to open link.

Emendations and Textual Notes
  nature. But ●  nature.— | But
  sell. Between ●  Sell.— | Between
  church. Send ●  church.— | Send
  have having ●  haveing
Top