Explanatory Notes        Apparatus Notes ()

Source: New York Public Library, Astor, Lenox, and Tilden Foundations, New York ([NN])

Cue: "Please send 2"

Source format: "MS"

Letter type: "[standard letter]"

Notes:

Last modified: 1998-04-09T00:00:00

Revision History: HES 1998-04-09 was to N Y Tribune editor

Published on MTPO: 2007

Print Publication: v5

MTPDocEd
To the Staff of the New York Tribune
7 March 1873 • Hartford, Conn. (MS: NN, UCCL 00885)
Gentlemen—

Please send 2 Credit Mobilier Extra sheets1explanatory note to

Yours &c
Mark Twain

Textual Commentary
7 March 1873 • To the Staff of the New York Tribune Hartford, Conn.UCCL 00885
Source text(s):

MS, Ford Collection, Personal (Miscellaneous) Papers, The New York Public Library, Astor, Lenox and Tilden Foundations (NN).

Previous Publication:

L5 , 314–315.

Provenance:

The MS belonged to journalist and businessman Gordon Lester Ford (1823–91), and was probably donated to NN in 1899.

More information on provenance may be found in Description of Provenanceclick to open link.

Explanatory Notes
1 

On 7 March, the Tribune advertised for sale an

extra sheet of eight pages, a complete résumé of the entire CREDIT MOBILIER INVESTIGATION. The reports which have for two months cumbered the papers are carefully condensed, winnowed of extraneous matter, and presented in a clear and intelligent shape without note or comment. (“New Publications,” 6)

Clemens probably intended to draw on this account for his portrayal of corrupt politicians in The Gilded Age. The Crédit Mobilier of America was a banking corporation chartered (under a different name) in 1863, through which the capitalists who were building the transcontinental railway (Union Pacific Railroad) pocketed exorbitant profits from 1867 to 1869 from government financing that greatly exceeded actual construction costs. Legislation permitting these actions had been passed in 1867 and 1868 by senators and representatives who had been bribed with gifts of valuable railroad stock. The Crédit Mobilier scandal became public late in the 1872 presidential campaign, and was investigated by House and Senate committees during the winter of 1872–73. Although the Senate ultimately took no punitive action, and the House censured only two of its members, the reputations of many politicians were damaged by the allegations of corruption (DAH, 2:84–85; Smith, 289–90; Annual Cyclopaedia 1873, 671–80).

Top