Explanatory Notes        Apparatus Notes ()

Source: Yale University, Beinecke Rare Book and Manuscript Library, New Haven, Conn ([CtY-BR])

Cue: "Confound it. I"

Source format: "MS"

Letter type: "[standard letter]"

Notes:

Last modified:

Revision History: AB

Published on MTPO: 2007

Print Publication: v5

MTPDocEd
To Elisha Bliss, Jr.
27 July 1873 • Edinburgh, Scotland (MS: CtY-BR, UCCL 00956)
Friend Bliss—

Confound it, I forgot to tell you not to advertise that pamphlet (in case you publish it) or send a copy to any newspaper.1explanatory note Bother the luck, I wanted it to pass unnoticed.

Shall I look for Gilded Age sheets pretty soon?2explanatory note

Ys
Clemens.

Care Routledge.
           London

letter docketed:and Mark Twain | Edinburgh July 27.

Textual Commentary
27 July 1873 • To Elisha Bliss, Jr.Edinburgh, ScotlandUCCL 00956
Source text(s):

MS, Beinecke Rare Book and Manuscript Library, Yale University (CtY-BR).

Previous Publication:

L5 , 420–421; MTLP , 79.

Provenance:

The MS was formerly laid in a first English edition copy of The Gilded Age (Routledge, 1874) owned by Owen F. Aldis (1852–1925), who donated his collection of American literature to CtY in 1911 (Cannon, 180).

More information on provenance may be found in Description of Provenanceclick to open link.

Explanatory Notes
1 

The proposed pamphlet of shah letters to the New York Herald (see 7 July 73 to Blissclick to open link).

2 

Although Clemens expected The Gilded Age to be published in Great Britain before his planned departure date of 25 October (see the next letter), Bliss had not yet forwarded any proofsheets for the English typesetters to work from. Clemens’s contract with the Routledges guaranteed them typesetting copy at least three weeks before publication of the American edition (Contract for the Routledge Gilded Age click to open link). The first salesmen’s prospectuses, comprising pages from the first fifteen chapters, came from the American Publishing Company bindery on 7 October, suggesting that proofsheets of those pages could have arrived in England at about that time. The cost of composition was entered in the Routledge ledger on 9 December, the probable date of completion of the English typesetting (APC, 95; Routledge Ledger Book 4:765, Routledge). Preliminary collations show that like the American edition, the bulk of the English edition incorporated revisions which Warner made in the manuscript after Clemens left for England in May, or on the early proofsheets, and which were then transmitted in the late proofsheets sent to England (13 May 73 to Warnerclick to open link). In the last nine chapters, however, the English edition accords more closely with the manuscript (only a fraction of which is extant), which suggests that Bliss was forced to forward unrevised proofs to speed up the production process. (An alternate—but less likely—possibility is that these late chapters were set from a fair copy of the manuscript, which of course also lacked Warner’s revisions.) This procedure enabled the English publishers to issue their edition slightly before the American one, as required to secure a valid copyright (see Hill 1965).

Top